The Next Bulgaria – A personal reflection on the future that should be.

On a winter morning in Sofia the station smells like coffee and brake dust. The departures board flips with that little clatter you feel more than hear, and the platform gathers its familiar cast: a nurse in white sneakers with a navy duffel; a physics medalist wearing the black coat his mother picked; a software engineer who keeps checking his phone, not for messages, but for the comfort of a familiar screen. The Vienna train inhales and exhales, like a swimmer about to push off the wall. A conductor lifts two fingers to his cap. The whistle is gentle, almost apologetic. The train feels as if it will always leave on time, even if life on the ground is less tidy.

For years, that scene has been used as evidence—proof that Bulgaria educates talent for export. If a country were a ledger, you could mark the departures in red. But a ledger is the wrong metaphor. A country is closer to a body, with its nerves and circulation and muscles, its immune system and the strange, patient organ we call resilience. Bodies don’t keep ledgers; they metabolize. Departures matter, but so do returns. The arrivals board at the airport is quieter, and harder to narrate, but it is there: a woman with a Dutch biomedicine degree hugging her father by the sliding doors; a couple from Chicago dragging two suitcases and a toddler, laughing at the cold; a back-from-London engineer texting a friend, “Да, тук ще пробвам.” That’s not an argument; it’s a pulse. You can count it if you listen.

The puzzle of transformation, properly told, is not about whether people leave. People leave everywhere. The real question is whether they can plug back in—whether there are sockets waiting, platforms sturdy enough to hold a life, and habits of coordination that don’t collapse each time the calendar flips from one government to the next. The countries that leap don’t simply add programs or budgets; they multiply effects. They behave less like committees and more like orchestras: when the strings find the tempo, the brass sounds better, and even the timid percussionist begins to hit on the beat.

We’re used to thinking of progress as addition. Add a program. Add a wing to a ministry. Add a new acronym. Addition fills slides. But addition is what committees do. Transformation—the kind that changes the behavior of a society—works by multiplication. If any essential factor is near zero—trust, interoperability, the ability to keep a promise through an election—then the whole product collapses. You can multiply a hundred by a hundred by a hundred by zero and still get zero. That is an unforgiving arithmetic, but it is also liberating, because it tells you where to look: not at the size of any one number, but at the stubborn zeros that break the spell.

Let’s look at the places that have rewritten their odds. Estonia, a small country with the institutional equivalent of baby teeth after 1991, chose to build plumbing rather than monuments: a digital backbone that let ministries and hospitals and municipalities talk to one another without phoning the minister. The first service took ages; the second took less; the third arrived faster still. Compounding is not magic; it’s a design choice that lowers the cost of the next improvement. Ireland, a nation that exported suitcases and tears for generations, built an agency that outlasted governments and remembered what it promised. South Korea, humiliated by crisis in 1997, walked through the fire with a blanket in hand—restructuring what had to be restructured and pairing pain with protection—then emerged selling not only cars and chips, but dramas and pop songs. Medellín drew a transit map where there had once been fear; cable cars and libraries stitched hills to valley, and the city discovered that dignity is a platform.

Those are mirrors, not models. Their lesson is not “be Estonia” or “be Ireland,” but “multiply what you already have.” And Bulgaria already has more than the departures board suggests. The trick is to connect what exists in ways that survive politics and shorten the distance between an idea and its implementation. Coherence—another cold word that hides a warm truth—is nothing more than the habit of making parts speak the same language at the same tempo.

Start with a story you could tell to a teenager who wonders why anyone stays. In a rented office on a Sofia side street two decades ago, four engineers built developer tools with a global audience in mind. The company they created would be acquired by a larger American firm years later, and that headline—big number, international buyer—was what most outsiders noticed. The more important story happened after the sale. The founders didn’t leave for a beach. They built a school for programmers that trained thousands, many of whom now populate teams you’ve heard of and teams you haven’t. They seeded venture funds. They mentored founders. A single exit became an ecosystem because the money returned as muscle and memory. That is what a platform looks like in civilian clothes: a company that turns into a school that turns into a network that turns into dozens of companies and hundreds of careers. The outward ripple is ordinary and enormous at once.

You can already see the same pattern in industries that sound, at first, like fantasy. Walk into a light-filled workshop in Sofia and you may find engineers designing and assembling nanosatellites for clients on other continents. They test boards and solder, run simulations, talk in the shorthand of orbital mechanics. When a satellite launches, the team watches the stream with a pride that seems too large for the room. Bulgaria’s story is not only call centers and code; it is circuitry that rides rockets. Space hardware might feel like an outlier, but the lesson is local: a frontier company acts as a magnet for interns from technical universities, as a customer for precision manufacturing, as a storyteller for children who think “engineer” means “abroad.” Platforms inspire because they normalize the extraordinary.

Drive east and a little south and you will hit a geography that used to be dismissed with a shrug. Plovdiv was, for a long time, that lovely second city you visited for a weekend and then forgot. Today it is an industrial orchestra. The Trakia Economic Zone feels like the kind of nonfiction that makes people suspicious—too many firms, too many trucks, too much movement—but the point isn’t the logo collage on a billboard. It’s the habit underneath: vocational schools that talk to factories, mayors who pick up phones, apprenticeships that translate into jobs, and suppliers who learn newer standards because a neighbor demanded them. If you listen long enough in a break room in Rakovski or Maritsa, you hear a sentence you didn’t hear a decade ago: “My kid can stay.” That sentence does not appear in economic statistics. It appears in family calendars, in the saturation of hope around graduation day.

Head north to Vratsa and you find a different kind of factory. The raw material is young people who didn’t think a laptop could change their life, and the machine is a classroom where code is taught not like a magic trick but like a craft. The graduates stay, or sometimes they leave for a while and then stay; the point isn’t purity. The point is that the peripheral town becomes a node on a network, and when a place becomes a node, its conversation with the capital changes. “What can you do for us?” turns into “Here is what we can offer.” A course catalog is not glamorous. It is an invitation to change migration patterns by making opportunity circulate locally.

Walk back to the capital and you find a campus that feels, on some days, like an empty stage and, on others, like a rehearsal room you’d pay to watch: a science and technology park where labs and startups share glass and light, where the coffee line is a seminar and the corridor is a talent market. It is tempting, in a culture that has learned to be cynical, to dismiss such places as photo opportunities. And sometimes they are. But even imperfect platforms matter because they are physical proof that institutions can learn to talk across walls. Inside the life sciences lab, a graduate who returned from Munich is running assays beside a classmate who never left. A clean-energy startup is building a prototype with a materials scientist who used to think industry meant “elsewhere.” The park is not an answer. It’s a socket. Sockets invite plugs.

And if you follow the trail of coffee cups across the city you will bump into an organization with a playful name that does a serious thing: it turns a diaspora into a network. For years, Bulgaria’s narrative about its citizens abroad was elegiac: a loss, a wound. Then a group of returnees decided to build an “arrival hall” of their own—job fairs for people with foreign degrees, mentorship programs, and a habit of introducing Bulgarians to one another as if they had always been neighbors. There’s a particular electricity in a room when a returnee realizes they won’t spend the next six months explaining themselves. Networks are permission machines. They tell you that trying here isn’t naive.

The optimistic case for Bulgaria doesn’t pretend the departures board is a mirage. It says that departures are a circuit, and circuits can be closed. It says that the organs are present—education that produces talent, clusters that produce demand, anchors in European institutions, and a civic appetite for dignity that shows up whenever a city cuts the ribbon on something that works—and that the work now is wiring those organs into a body that can metabolize crisis into improvement.

Which brings us to the quiet crisis—the one that doesn’t scream. Demography doesn’t explode; it evaporates. A village loses its midwife, then its teacher, then the bus route that made the hospital a forty-minute ride and not a two-hour journey; the empty house becomes two, then five; and the mayor spends a year looking for a dentist and ends with a brave nurse and a dental kit. You cannot scold a population curve into bending. But you can bend it with design. The places that do this well start with a promise so simple it’s almost impolite to say it out loud: if you form a family here, the systems will treat you like you belong. That means child allowances that arrive without a pilgrimage; schools that have seats where jobs actually are; clinics that have nurses because the nurses didn’t spend three months waiting on a certificate; housing permits that know the difference between a home and a headache. The administrative state can feel like weather—uncontrollable and arbitrary. Turn it into climate: predictable and livable.

You don’t need to invent this from scratch. Bulgaria has long practiced the art of turning scarcity into specialization. The yogurt you grew up with was not just comfort food; it was microbiology. Lactobacillus bulgaricus is not just a national joke; it’s a demonstration that a culture—literal and metaphorical—can become an export when disciplined by science. The film industry on the outskirts of Sofia is not just entertainment; it is soundstages, stunt teams, carpenters who learned to build Rome in a parking lot and made it look better on camera than the original. Kazanlak is not just roses; it is rose oil turned into perfume turned into a supply chain that runs from a field to a fashion house. These are not fairy tales. They are platforms with smell and texture, talent embedded in process, heritage made useful by modernity.

And remember the names history has already given you permission to borrow. There is a mid-century physicist with a Bulgarian father whose machine gave the world a way to compute. There are mathematicians and chess prodigies and opera singers who prove, in different registers, the same thing: that skill is a portable capital stock. Diasporas can be heartbreaks. They can also be batteries. The difference is whether the wires reach home.

What, then, does coherence look like when you design toward it on purpose? Start with the plumbing: a digital backbone that is not a press conference but a policy. The technical phrase is “interoperability,” which sounds like a cure for insomnia but hides a revolution. It means a citizen proves who she is once; that a health record, with consent, moves as easily as a rumor; that a company is born with one form; that a municipality talks to a ministry without an emissary; that every new service inherits the hard work the previous service already did. You cannot campaign on that. You can live on it. And you can keep living on it after the next cabinet, because a backbone that can be fired was never a backbone.

Then borrow the Irish trick without borrowing the Irish weather. Build an investment agency with a mandate that is boring and a culture that is proud: pick sectors where Bulgaria already has adjacency—software and product design, satellite components and ground systems, biotech and clinical research, precision machining for green energy. Do not fall in love with whales. Love schools and small suppliers and second investors. Write into law what cannot be meddled with—how leaders are chosen and fired, what data must be published monthly, which deals require which thresholds of approval. Train the agency to answer the phone on Fridays and to remember promises on Mondays. Host, once a quarter, a call where new investors and old compare notes, because nothing sells like someone else’s relief that they were not fooled.

Third, scale the diaspora bridge that already exists. If a nonprofit can welcome home thousands, a nation can welcome tens of thousands. Imagine a single window for returnees that folds the many small frictions—credential recognition, school placement for kids, spousal work permits, housing—into a predictable sequence. Imagine “return zones” in cities and towns that bundle child care with job matching and co-working with municipal warmth. Write a tax rule that treats a returning company the way an investor treats a seed round. The goal isn’t to bribe people home. It’s to remove the small humiliations that make staying away feel rational.

Fourth, think like a city that draws dignity on a map. Where are the hour-long distances that a bridge or a bus lane or a clinic would erase? Which neighborhoods have to budget courage into their morning routine? Put libraries where teenagers wait for nothing good to happen. Put a cable bus where a hill pretends to be a wall. The engineers will tell you how many minutes a new connection saves. The sociologists will tell you what those minutes are worth in hope. Neither set of numbers will be exactly right. Both will point in the same direction: inclusion as infrastructure.

Fifth, practice the art of bending without breaking. If you want firms to automate and workers to retrain and towns to rezone, you cannot finance that with speeches. You finance it with insurances that make risk feel like adulthood, not like a dare. A portable pension that follows the worker and not the employer is not a luxury. It’s an invitation to move from a dying industry to a growing one. Unemployment insurance that pays for reskilling is not softness. It’s a platform for courage. Bankruptcy rules that treat a first failure as tuition will do more for entrepreneurship than posters that say “Innovation.”

Skeptics will object, and they will be half right. They will point to a dashboard that still doesn’t work, to a smart city app that was smarter than the budget, to a pilot that never learned to land. They will remind you of Greece, or of a neighboring country where the acronym changed each year but the form didn’t. The point of a platform is not that it never stumbles. It is that it stumbles forward. Judge by the interval between problem and fix. If the second service arrives faster than the first, the spine is taking. If the second investor feels less like a pilgrim and more like a neighbor, the agency is learning. If the second returning family finds the kindergarten without knowing a cousin at the municipality, the bridge is holding.

Multiplication doesn’t begin with billion-euro projects. It begins with decisions that seem ordinary: to refurbish a school workshop, to open a studio in a provincial city, to draw a bus line that respects commuters’ lives. When repeated and connected, these choices compound into platforms of trust and coherence. Here are three Bulgarian sketches—not yet headlines, but plausible, close enough to feel real—that show how this multiplication could work.

A mayor in a Rhodope town that used to lose its teenagers to the city might choose to refurbish the vocational school workshop rather than build a photo-friendly “innovation hub.” She could sign agreements with three companies two towns over. If the school modernizes its mechatronics track, they will take apprentices and pay them properly. Five years later, the robotics club could meet where the broken chairs used to be stored. There would be a whiteboard with a schedule that maps skill modules to real jobs. The “good” math teacher, once famous for producing emigrants, could keep a different list now: graduates who stayed. It isn’t a headline, but it is how compounding begins.

In Veliko Tarnovo, imagine a young couple returning from the Midwest and starting a small design studio that sells Bulgarian aesthetics to the world—wood, wool, and code. Their first hire is a former classmate. Their second is someone they met at a diaspora event they almost didn’t attend. Their third is a woman from a nearby village who learned Figma in a library workshop funded by a grant that never made the news. None of this is dramatic. It is exactly how change looks when it is working—quiet, steady, cumulative.

In Burgas, picture a planner with a notebook full of bus lines, drawing not the route that would look good in a presentation but the one that makes a parent’s commute ten minutes shorter. The line opens. Ridership grows because the line makes sense, because transfers line up when it rains, because the bus feels like a promise kept. The second line is easier. The third is inevitable. Smart cities are not apps. They are timetables.

If you collect these kinds of sketches and place them next to the more famous stories—Tallinn’s codes, Dublin’s deals, Seoul’s second chances, Medellín’s cables—you begin to see the outline of a Bulgarian chapter that is not borrowed. It has the same grammar: platforms that outlast moods, networks that answer phones, anchors that stabilize without suffocating, crises that open the door long enough to carry in the furniture. It has local nouns. It smells like roses in May and welding smoke in October. It involves teachers who refuse to let a student disappear, and engineers who solder quietly, and civil servants who treat a form as a promise instead of a test.

Will it be enough? That’s the wrong question. The right one is simpler and more demanding: will the work compound? If the cost of doing the next right thing goes down with every right thing you do, you are on the curve that changes history. If it does not, you are moving furniture around a room whose walls are closing in. The test is not how loud the speech is. It is how quiet the system becomes when it works. Quiet as in: the nurse got her certificate in a week, so she stayed. Quiet as in: the apprenticeship led to a contract without a cousin. Quiet as in: the library is open late and the lights actually work.

Return, one last time, to the station. The evening trains line up like options: Vienna, Berlin, Dublin, London. The air smells like brake dust and chestnuts from a cart at the edge of the square. The boy in the black coat counts the cars again. He will go. He should, perhaps. The world is large. The question his country must answer is not how to stop him. It is how to make it easy to come back without drama, how to make the socket ready when he is ready, how to make the habit of coherence so normal that it doesn’t require speeches to defend it.

Somewhere across town, in a fluorescent room with a cheap carpet and a timeline taped to the wall, a square on a chart turns from amber to green because a database now talks to another database, because a registrar knows how to send an answer without a fax, because a contract template was rewritten in a way that a human can read. No one claps. A civil servant drinks a glass of water and goes home in the dark. That square on the wall is not a symbol. It is a hinge. Doors don’t swing without hinges. Countries don’t turn without them either.

Tomorrow morning the trains will leave again. They always do. But if you have been watching closely, you will notice a second rhythm: the arrivals board that used to blink like an afterthought has begun to look crowded. There’s a coder with a baby stroller, a nurse who found a ward she trusts, a satellite engineer who wants to be closer to the mountains, a teacher who missed the sound of her language in a classroom. Call it optimism if you want. What it really is is sturdier: the arithmetic of coherence—small numbers multiplied, zeros hunted down, promises kept often enough that people stop noticing. That is not branding. That is how a place begins to feel like it belongs to those who live in it.

Scroll to Top